The one thing that is making the implementation of BIM (Building Information Modelling) on Projects very difficult and frustrating is what I call “pseudo BIM”, killing any initial enthusiasm to use BIM, and leading to generalisation statements in industry like “BIM costs more” or “BIM is expensive” and “BIM is too difficult”.
More people practice “pseudo BIM” than you would imagine, and unsuspecting clients, who can’t spot the difference, are being “sold a pup”.
So what is “Pseudo BIM”?
To answer this, I need to explain the difference between the traditional process of creating, managing and exchanging design and construction information, with a true BIM process.
The Traditional Approach.
The traditional process of communicating design and construction information involves the production of “documents”, separately produced 2-dimensional drawings, schedules, and specifications. In this process, the information about the building and components can be produce a number of times, in plan, elevation, section, detail view, listed in a schedule, and described in a specification. Coordinating all these “documents” to make sure they describe the same thing, requires manually checking. If a change is required, this change has to be made and coordinated across all these separate documents. This is prone to human error, and conflicts in the documents result in misunderstanding, delays, variations, cost overruns and disputes. The exchange of information between stages is usually paper, or static digital copies of the “documents” (e.g. PDF). This isn’t digital data that can be extracted, queried or edited, so it usually involves the next party having to absorb the cost and time to re-create the information in their systems in order to do their work. It is all these issues which BIM aims to address.
The BIM Approach.
BIM is about constructing a digital virtual 3-dimensional building, from objects (components) that represent their real-life counterparts. In comparison to the traditional approach above, in BIM you only describe the building components once, in the 3D model, and each object, is a digital container, or placeholder of all the relevant information about that component. In the virtual 3D environment, people can look around and immediately appreciate and understand what the building is, and how everything works together. The software can even automatically find clashes between objects. They can click on objects, and see all the relevant information. They can query or extract this information to use in other processes, like project planning or sequencing (4D BIM) quantity take-off and cost checking (5D BIM), detailed analysis for structural performance, energy performance etc. (6D BIM), or operations and maintenance information (7D BIM). In other words, the effort of describing the objects once, can be leverage multiple times by multiple people for multiple purposes. And of course, let’s not forget about “the documents” we have to produce – drawings and schedules are “views” generated from the model, for output for record purposes (the real value is in the model, not the documents). These only have to be set-up, they are not manually produced, and since they are all being derived from the same digital database, they are all automatically coordinated. If a change is required, you make that change once in the 3D model, and all of the “views” are automatically updated.
So you can see, when comparing the traditional approach, with a true BIM approach, that the latter is a far more efficient, and therefore less time-consuming, and therefore less costly way of working. The 3D models are easier for everyone to understand, and also result in better design coordination, and therefore fewer potential errors for misunderstanding, delays, variations, cost overruns and disputes.
So what is “Pseudo BIM”? Read More
Thanks for reading!
Please enjoy a limited number of articles over the next 30 days.
For total access log in to your The BIM Hub account. Or register now, it's free.